LUIZA CH. SAVAGE
Ron Covais is in a hurry. The president of the Americas for defence
giant Lockheed Martin, and a former Pentagon adviser to Dick Cheney,
he's one of a cherry-picked group of executives who were whisked to
Cancún in March by the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, and
asked to come up with a plan for taking North American integration
beyond NAFTA. Covais figures they've got less than two years of
political will to make it happen. That's when the Bush administration
exits, and "The clock will stop if the Harper minority government falls
or a new government is elected." In Cancún, the executives gathered
behind closed doors in a luxury hotel and vented about slow borders,
duplicate regulations and the competitive threat from the European
Union and Asia. "It was an intimate discussion. It was a lot of fun,
there were no reporters, just a freewheeling discussion on the things
that drive you crazy," recalls Annette Verschuren, the president of
Home Depot Canada, who flew in on Harper's jet and said the PM was
"very engaged."
The leaders organized the CEOs into a
formal advisory body, the North American Competitiveness Council. In
June, they met in Washington, with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos
Gutierrez, Mexican Economy Minister Sergio Garcia de Alba, and Canada's
Industry Minister Maxime Bernier, who asked for help in solving the
"bottlenecks" created by laws and regulations. "The guidance from the
ministers was, 'tell us what we need to do and we'll make it happen,' "
recalls Covais, who chairs the U.S. section of the council, which
includes 10 CEOs of big companies like Wal-Mart, General Motors and
Merck. The Canadian section, chaired by Linda Hasenfratz, CEO of
Guelph-based autoparts maker Linamar Corp., includes executives from
such heavyweights as Bell Canada, Suncor, CN, Power Corp., and
Scotiabank.
The executives have boiled their priorities down to
three: the Canadian CEOs are focusing on "border crossing
facilitation," the Americans have taken on "regulatory convergence,"
and the Mexicans are looking at "energy integration" in everything from
electrical grids to the locating of liquid natural gas terminals. They
plan to present recommendations to the ministers in October.
This
is how the future of North America now promises to be written: not in a
sweeping trade agreement on which elections will turn, but by the
accretion of hundreds of incremental changes implemented by executive
agencies, bureaucracies and regulators. "We've decided not to recommend
any things that would require legislative changes," says Covais.
"Because we won't get anywhere."
In his Crystal City, Va.,
office, Covais keeps a black binder of proposals from American
business. Some are specific: the adoption of American container sizes
for baby food; a common list of "hazardous substances"; continental
standards for food labelling. Others are sweeping: everyone should
follow the U.S. lead of requiring federal regulators to base their
regulations on the voluntary standards of private industry.
Regulatory
harmonization has long been championed by the Canadian Council of Chief
Executives, and was endorsed by a task force co-chaired by former
Liberal industry minister John Manley in 2005. But critics fear the
current approach will mean lowest-common-denominator regulations, a
process dominated by U.S. interests, and an enlargement of NAFTA by
stealth. "These are issues that need to be discussed, but not resolved
behind closed doors with input only from big business," says Jean-Yves
Lefort, trade campaigner for the Council of Canadians.
Bernier told Maclean's
he's pleased so far. "We have many of Canada's key business leaders at
the table. They are working hard to represent the interests of Canadian
business and all Canadians." Their recommendations will be considered
along with "other advice and input," he said, as the three governments
move forward on the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" launched in
2005.
Still others complain the approach is too timid. Robert
Pastor, director of the Center for North American Studies at American
University in Washington, said the leaders should launch broad
consultations on major moves, like a common external tariff and a
continental transportation network. "None of these big issues are being
discussed. Instead we have a CEO council that is looking at the issue
one regulation at a time," he said. But the CEOs say they have a
strategy. "Let's get some low-hanging fruit to give the thing some
momentum," says Hasenfratz. "But let's not lose sight of bigger-ticket
items."
Read Luiza Ch. Savage's weblog, Savage Washington
To comment, email letters@macleans.ca